Home » Posts tagged 'liberal'

Tag Archives: liberal

Hey Liberals, Your Hypocrisy is Showing

Ah, yes, the old “liberals are compassionate, and conservatives are selfish” canard.

See, this is why conservatives can’t have a decent debate with a liberal. If we disagree with you on anything, it must be because we’re horrible people. It couldn’t possibly be for any other reason, such as, oh, I don’t know:

  • It’s a nice idea, but we can’t afford it
  • You’re making the “problem” into a much bigger deal than it really is
  • Private enterprise will provide a better and more efficient solution
  • Government “solutions” tend to create just as many (if not more) problems than they purport to fix
  • Once you create a government bureaucracy, it never stops growing
  • Government power corrupts – even if you have good people administering a government program right now (and that’s a big if), you can’t guarantee the power will never be usurped by someone who will abuse it
  • We’re pretty sure it’s just a shameless power grab
  • We value liberty, just like our Founding Fathers did, and we believe people are capable of making their own decisions

I’m sure other people have yet other reasons for opposing an ever-larger government.  We won’t know until we ask them.

That’s what you need to do.  If someone has an opposing opinion to your own, ask them why they think that way instead of assuming it’s because they’re stupid, or selfish, or bigoted.

But that takes time.  It requires effort and genuine compassion to get to know someone and fairly consider their contrary views.  It’s much easier to call them names and declare that you’ve “won.”

Whatever happened to the famed liberal “tolerance”?  I guess it only applies to people who agree with them.

The Real Rape Culture

I actually wrote this post a few years ago, but never published it, knowing the backlash I’ll probably get.  Here it is anyway.

I was talking to a young liberal acquaintance of mine about what she wants to do with her life.  She said she wanted to study abroad.  I was responding politely when she suddenly mentioned that she will possibly study in Dubai.

“You heard about the Norwegian tourist who went do Dubai, didn’t you?” I asked.  I’d mentally debated whether or not I should say anything, and decided to mention it out of a feeling of responsibility towards my (apparently very naive) friend.  She answered that she had not heard about the tourist.  So I filled her in.

A Norwegian woman went to Dubai on vacation and was raped.  When she reported it to the authorities, she was thrown into jail.  (For more details, see this article on BBC News)

My friend’s reaction?

“Well, I’m going as a student, so that’s different.”

Right.  I’m sure the rapists will stop to ask you what kind of visa you have.

“I don’t know about their culture, about their beliefs.”

You know enough to know that rape is wrong.  If this had happened in Texas, you’d be cussing out Republicans, petitioning Congress, and leading protests.  And well you should!  Because what happened to this woman is a heinous crime!  But, because this happened in a predominantly Muslim country, apparently it’s okay.  We just have to understand their culture and beliefs.

“I wouldn’t go to any country without learning about their culture.”

I’m sure the rapists will stop to ask you how much you know about Islam.

The verdict is in.  Apparently, rape is okay if it’s part of your beliefs and/or culture.  Or, maybe, if we “understood” more about Islam, somehow incidents like this wouldn’t happen.

That would be because no non-Muslim would ever travel to a Muslim country.

Not to mention that this is implying the Norwegian woman was raped because she didn’t understand the culture.  That sure sounds a lot like the “blaming the victim” thing that liberals supposedly don’t like.

Before anyone decides to call me a bigot (too late), I’ll say this: of course not all Muslims are rapists.  Nevertheless, the United Arab Emirates is ruled by a monarchy with law based on Sharia.  Perhaps that has something do with Marteh Deborah Dalalv’s experience?  No western country would throw a woman in jail for being raped.  Sounds like Sharia law allows rapists to get away with their evil acts.

Pretending Ms. Dalelv’s experience doesn’t matter helps no one.  Not Muslims who are good, decent people, and not innocent women.  Throwing a woman into jail for being raped is not okay.  It’s so far from okay that I’m surprised anyone could act as nonchalantly about it as my friend did.

My point isn’t to say that Islam is bad.  Many Muslims are perfectly nice people, just trying to live their lives like the rest of us.  My point is that institutionalized Sharia law is a problem, particularly when it comes to how it treats women and crimes against them, and yet a typical liberal response is to pretend this isn’t a problem for the sake of not appearing “inclusive” and “tolerant.”

I’m sure I’ll get called many names for this post, but it needed to be said.

Further information:

Conservatism Is Not Complacency

Yesterday I read a comment in a book equating conservatism with complacency.  To say that to be conservative is to be complacent is arrogant, foolish, and ignorant.

The generally accepted definition of Conservatism, (even Wikipedia agrees), is that conservatism wants to keep traditional institutions, practices, and values.  What is complacent about thinking tradition is a good thing?  After all, traditions must be maintained in order to continue.

Traditions do not have the force of law or physics to support them.  To end a tradition, all that must happen is for people to stop following it.  People and organizations are actively trying to dissuade the public from continuing American traditions concerning family, self-reliance, and the role of government.  Continuing traditions when others are trying to destroy them requires vigilance and diligence, which are the opposite of complacency.

Some of these “complacent” traditions that, nevertheless, have value, are:

  • Marriage – Sexual relations are for marriage.  A man and a woman who are married should love, support, and be faithful to one another.
  • Family – Children should be raised by a mother and father who are married.  Obviously, this isn’t always possible, but it is the ideal to strive for.
  • Self-Reliance – The person who is responsible for your health and well-being is you.  If you do something monumentally stupid and/or irresponsible, you should face the consequences.  If you work hard to build a good life for yourself, you should reap the benefits.
  • Charity – Giving money, food, clothes, etc., to others is a good thing, and should be carried out by individuals and voluntary organizations, not government.
  • Government – The purpose of government is to look after national interests, things that are important to our country as a whole, such as the security of our borders.  It should not concern itself with the personal decisions of private citizens.
  • Second Amendment – People have a right to defend themselves, their families, and their property, in the way they think is best, while respecting the rights of others to do the same.  Period.

Does any of that sound complacent?  To actually live as a conservative is hard work.  It means you have to take care of yourself and your family, be an active member of your community, and try to be a generally good person, all while liberals and the media tell you that you’re a racist, ignorant bigot who should just let those infallible higher beings, politicians, make all the hard decisions (like what size soda to buy) for you, just because you want to live and let live.

Some time ago, President Obama made a snarky comment about racist and bitter voters who “cling to guns or religion.”  The implication is clear: both guns and religion are bad.  Why these things are bad remains unclear.  It’s probably because people who are religious and support the second amendment tend to disagree with the president.

What is wrong with “clinging” to your own way of life?  When the president equates it with racism and bitterness, he shows that he (like the rest of the left) doesn’t understand the value of tradition or traditional values.

It’s “traditional” to wash your hands after using the bathroom, to avoid spreading germs.  It’s traditional to learn to add and subtract.  It’s traditional to wait patiently in line at the cash register instead of throwing a temper tantrum.  We follow all these “traditions,” and many more, because they have value to individuals and society.

The same thing goes for the traditions valued by conservatives.  Being old-fashioned, commonly accepted, and expected does not make something wrong.  Just because the left says alternatives to tradition are fashionable does not make them good or right.

Conservatism looks at the past, finds value in it, and upholds traditional values and practices.  Liberalism looks for the next greatest thing, which turns out to not be not-so-great, so they must look for the next next greatest thing.  That sounds exhausting, and pointless.  I’ll stick with what I already know is good: conservative, traditional values.  There is no need to reinvent the wheel.

Tolerance is the Virtue of the Man Without Convictions

That was said by G. K. Chesterton.  He was an English writer whose book The Everlasting Man set atheist C.S. Lewis on the path to Christianity.  This post isn’t do discuss G. K. Chesterton, however, (worthy topic though that would be), but to discuss tolerance.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I hate that word.  We are told to “tolerate” those who are different from us, usually while not being tolerated ourselves.

“Tolerate” is the word I use for uncomfortable, annoying, or unpleasant circumstances I am forced to bear.  Believe me, if I am ever moved to say I “tolerate” you, you can be sure that I do not like you one bit.

Being a conservative Christian living a a very liberal state, I am frequently surrounded by people with very different opinions from mine.  Often, I am diametrically opposed to the the politics and morality of people around me, even people who are my friends.

Agreeing with me on politics is not part of my criteria for who I am friends with and who I respect (thankfully, else I probably wouldn’t have many friends!).  I can respect those who disagree with me if they take a principled stand.

It drives me crazy when I see individuals or companies just going with the majority.  The character Truly on ABCFamily’s show “Bunheads” (really cute show, by the way) sums up this way of life nicely.  To paraphrase: she is never a tie-breaker; she always votes with the majority.  Actually, she waits until everyone else votes, that way she can then vote with the majority.

Flip-flopping is a side effect of just going with the majority.  Now, this is not to be confused with changing your mind.  Flip-flopping means you just say whatever you think will be the most popular in that particular time and circumstances, usually going back and forth between the same positions multiple times.

I have no problem with someone who admits they were wrong in the past or, after receiving new information, reviews their opinions and arrives at a new one.  Being able to evaluate your conclusions and discard false ones shows maturity, and is an integral part of science and learning.

G. K. Chesterton was talking about something a little different when he said this.  It’s easy to be tolerant of things if you have no principles.

For example, if you think sex is just about biology, and is perfectly fine if it’s consensual, you probably won’t mind casual sex, lots of sexual content in the media, and schools handing out condoms to minors.  On the other hand, if you believe sex is only for marriage, those things probably bother you a lot.  You might even want to do something about them to prevent them.

Our lives don’t improve if we “tolerate” things.  You’ll fail in school if you just tolerate it and don’t make an effort to do well.  You’ll never move out of your mom’s house if you tolerate being dependent and don’t go out and get a job.  You’ll be stuck in a job you hate if you tolerate low wages and poor working conditions and don’t try to improve your job or find a new one.  Your kids will be disrespectful and irresponsible if you tolerate poor behavior.

Don’t tolerate things you believe are wrong.  Act on your principles.  If you don’t have any, find some.